The Open Environmental & Biological Monitoring Journal

2012, 1 : 16-25
Published online 2012 May 27. DOI: 10.2174/1875040000801010016
Publisher ID: TOEBMJ-1-16

Combining Existing Monitoring Sites with a Probability Survey Design—Examples from U.S. EPA's National Coastal Assessment

John F. Paul , Henry A. Walker , Walter Galloway , Gerald Pesch , Donald Cobb , Charles J. Strobel , J. Kevin Summers , Michael Charpentier and James Heltshe
National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Drop B343-06, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 USA.

ABSTRACT

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) National Coastal Assessment was envisioned as a research effort led by EPA’s Office of Research and Development to evaluate assessment methods for ecosystem condition monitoring. The program was conducted through strategic partnerships with the coastal states. These states conducted the survey in their waters with a common set of indicators. The resources targeted for initial monitoring were estuarine waters. A flexible probability survey design was used to incorporate, to the extent possible, existing state monitoring program sites. Three criteria were developed to evaluate existing monitoring program sites in the northeastern United States for possible incorporation into the national design: (1) the sites were selected to be representative, (2) the variables sampled at the sites were similar in distribution with variables from a probability design, and (3) the correlation structure of variables was equivalent to that for a probability design. Detailed examples were presented for Long Island Sound water quality sites, New Jersey coastal water quality sites, and Casco Bay, ME, sediment sites to illustrate the approach.

Keywords:

Survey data , probability samples, estuaries.