The Open Medical Imaging Journal

2008, 2 : 67-79
Published online 2008 August 1. DOI: 10.2174/1874347100802010067
Publisher ID: TOMIJ-2-67

Advantages of Hybrid SPECT/CT vs SPECT Alone

Heather A. Jacene , Sibyll Goetze , Heena Patel , Richard L. Wahl and Harvey A. Ziessman
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 3235, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

ABSTRACT

We present our initial two year clinical experience with SPECT/CT, compare the interpretation to SPECT alone, provide illustrative cases, and review the published literature. Hybrid SPECT/CT has added clinical value over SPECT imaging alone primarily due to more precise anatomical lesion localization. After reading this report, the reader will appreciate the advantages of SPECT/CT imaging for clinical practice. We have reviewed SPECT/CT studies of 144 adult patients referred for various clinical indications in a busy nuclear medicine practice. The SPECT and fused SPECT/CT images were reviewed and interpreted separately to determine if addition of the fused CT images added incremental information, e.g., more definitive anatomic localization, more definitive diagnostic certainty, or changed final image interpretation compared to the SPECT images alone. Our analysis showed that SPECT/CT provided additional information for image interpretation in 54% (78/144) of cases. In most of these (68/78), the CT data improved localization of abnormal and physiologic findings. Diagnostic certainty was improved in 34/144 cases (24%) and image interpretation was beneficially altered in 18/144 cases (13%). The fusion of anatomical and functional information by hybrid SPECT/CT positively impacts image interpretation and adds diagnostic value over SPECT alone.